Saturday, December 8, 2012

Warning for all re Ibuprofen use

December 5, 2012, 12:01 am  from NY TIMES

For Athletes, Risks From Ibuprofen Use

Many active people use the painkiller ibuprofen on an almost daily basis. In surveys, up to 70 percent of distance runners and other endurance athletes report that they down the pills before every workout or competition, viewing the drug as a preemptive strike against muscle soreness.
But a valuable new study joins growing evidence that ibuprofen and similar anti-inflammatory painkillers taken before a workout don't offer any benefit and may be causing disagreeable physical damage instead, particularly to the intestines.
Studies have already shown that strenuous exercise alone commonly results in a small amount of intestinal trauma. A representative experiment published last year found that cyclists who rode hard for an hour immediately developed elevated blood levels of a marker that indicates slight gastrointestinal leakage.
Physiologically, it makes sense that exercise would affect the intestines as it does, since, during prolonged exertion, digestion becomes a luxury, said Dr. Kim van Wijck, currently a surgical resident at Orbis Medical Center in the Netherlands, who led the small study. So the blood that normally would flow to the small intestine is instead diverted to laboring muscles. Starved of blood, some of the cells lining the intestines are traumatized and start to leak.
Thankfully, the damage seems to be short-lived, Dr. van Wijck said. Her research has shown that within an hour after a cyclist finished riding, the stressed intestines returned to normal.
But the most common side-effect of ibuprofen is gastrointestinal damage. And since many athletes take the drug for pain before and after a workout, Dr. van Wijck set out to determine the combined effect of exercise and ibuprofen.
For the new study, published in the December issue of Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, researchers at Maastricht University in the Netherlands recruited nine healthy, active men and had them visit the university's human performance lab four times.
During two of the visits, the men rested languorously for an hour, although before one of the visits, they swallowed 400 milligrams of ibuprofen the night before and also the morning of their trip to the lab. (Four hundred milligrams is the recommended non-prescription dosage for adults using the drug to treat headaches or other minor pain.)
During the remaining visits, the men briskly rode stationary bicycles for that same hour. Before one of those rides, though, they again took 400 milligrams of ibuprofen the night before and the morning of their workout.
At the end of each rest or ride, researchers drew blood to check whether the men's small intestines were leaking. Dr. van Wijck found that blood levels of a protein indicating intestinal leakage were, in fact, much higher when the men combined bike riding with ibuprofen than during the other experimental conditions when they rode or took ibuprofen alone. Notably, the protein levels remained elevated several hours after exercise and ibuprofen.
The health implications of this finding are not yet clear, although they are worrying, Dr. van Wijck said. It may be that if someone uses ibuprofen before every exercise session for a year or more, she said, "intestinal integrity might be compromised." In that case, small amounts of bacteria and digestive enzymes could leak regularly into the bloodstream.
More immediately, if less graphically, the absorption of nutrients could be compromised, especially after exercise, Dr. van Wijck said, which could affect the ability of tired muscles to resupply themselves with fuel and regenerate.
The research looks specifically at prophylactic use of ibuprofen and does not address the risks and benefits of ibuprofen after an injury occurs. Short-term use of Ibuprofen for injury is generally considered appropriate.
Meanwhile, the Dutch study is not the first to find damage from combining exercise and ibuprofen. Earlier work has shown that frequent use of the drug before and during workouts also can lead to colonic seepage. In a famous study from a few years ago, researchers found that runners at the Western States 100-Mile Endurance Run who were regular ibuprofen users had small amounts of colonic bacteria in their bloodstream.
Ironically, this bacterial incursion resulted in "higher levels of systemic inflammation," said David C. Nieman, a professor of health and exercise science at Appalachian State University who conducted the study and is himself an ultramarathoner. In other words, the ultramarathon racers who frequently used ibuprofen, an anti-inflammatory, wound up with higher overall levels of bodily inflammation. They also reported being just as sore after the race as runners who had not taken ibuprofen.
Animal studies have also shown that ibuprofen hampers the ability of muscles to rebuild themselves after exercise. So why do so many athletes continue enthusiastically to swallow large and frequent doses of ibuprofen and related anti-inflammatory painkillers, including aspirin, before and during exercise?
"The idea is just entrenched in the athletic community that ibuprofen will help you to train better and harder," Dr. Nieman said. "But that belief is simply not true. There is no scientifically valid reason to use ibuprofen before exercise and many reasons to avoid it."
Dr. van Wijck agrees. "We do not yet know what the long-term consequences are" of regularly mixing exercise and ibuprofen, she said. But it is clear that "ibuprofen consumption by athletes is not harmless and should be strongly discouraged."

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

An Uplifting Experience As Told In A Blog


I’ve been quiet for some months but feel I MUST post this so that you can read the blog:

It was sent to me by a  friend who told me about this lady, Seok Han - a niece of his wife. So it’s not a fairy tale but a real life account.

In the past few years we have lived through Lin’s and friends’ bouts with cancer and, with much sadness,  friends’ deaths from this disease.

Thankfully we have also come upon hope and success -  and a handful of miracles. How else could I describe instances when the cancers disappeared without medical intervention?

Yes, gone today but we all still live with the knowledge and fear that it may announce its ugly presence again.

I won’t go into details of the other cancer patients who are now cancer free, but include Seok Hean’s blog here because she wants others to share her experience. 

While she credits the drastic change in her eating habits for being cancer free, I cannot help thinking about Steve Jobs who was fussy about his food and a vegetarian (also a ‘fruitatarian’ at one stage of his life) who eventually succumbed to cancer. So it’s ‘horses for courses’ as the saying goes.

All I can say is to live life to the full and try to avoid stress. If only it were that easy to not worry and just be happy!

Sunday, July 29, 2012


Recently I have read about noise in cities (New York Times, July) and now WSJ has run an article which our planners in Singapore should read and try to understand!


For Creative Cities, the Sky Has Its Limit

By RICHARD FLORIDA

image
Aurora PhotosShanghai's skyscraper district is ultradense, but New York, London and Milan are better at promoting innovation.
Ours is the century of the city. For the first time in history, more than half of the people in the world, 3.3 billion of us, live in cities. By 2050, according to the best projections, urbanites will account for as much as 70% of the global population.
Over the next 50 years we will spend trillions of dollars on city building. The question is: How should we build? For many economists, urbanists and developers, the answer is simple: We should build up. But the answer is more complex than that.
Researchers at the Santa Fe Institute have been able to demonstrate that bigger, denser cities literally speed up the metabolism of daily life. Larger beasts may have slower metabolisms in the animal kingdom, but the opposite occurs in cities, which get faster as they grow. Doubling a city's population, the Santa Fe researchers found, more than doubles its creative and economic output, a phenomenon known as "superlinear scaling."
Still, density is only part of the solution. In the hyper-crowded skyscraper districts of Shanghai, densities can approach 125,000 people per square mile. Giant buildings often function as vertical suburbs, muting the spontaneous encounters that provide cities with so much of their social, intellectual and commercial energy. People live their lives indoors in such places, wearing paths between their offices and the food courts, always seeing the same people.
In terms of innovation and creative impetus, Shanghai pales in comparison to New York, London, Paris and Milan, not to mention high-tech hubs like Silicon Valley, the Bay Area, Seattle, Boston, Austin and North Carolina's research triangle, all of which have much lower densities.
It turns out that what matters most for a city's metabolism—and, ultimately, for its economic growth—isn't density itself but how much people mix with each other. And there isn't just one formula for that. It can happen in the pedestrian-oriented sidewalk culture of New York and London but also—to the chagrin of many urbanists—in the car-dependent sprawl of a suburban nerdistan like Silicon Valley. That region, as Jonah Lehrer has pointed out, manages to emulate the functions of bigger, denser cities by encouraging the clustering of talent and enterprise and fostering a high level of information-sharing.
In fact, there are two types of density, according to a recent study by Peter Gordon of the University of Southern California and Sanford Ikeda of the State University of New York, Purchase. "Crude" density is achieved by districts packed with taller and taller buildings but doesn't, on its own, generate innovation or economic development.
By contrast, what the authors call "Jacobs density" sparks street-level interaction and maximizes the "potential informal contact of the average person in a given public space at any given time." It makes networking and informal encounters more likely and also creates a demand for local products and diversity—not just of populations and ethnic groups but of tastes and preferences.
The authors dub it "Jacobs density" in tribute to Jane Jacobs, the renowned urbanist and author of "The Death and Life of Great American Cities." She famously said, "In the absence of a pedestrian scale, density can be big trouble."
Look at New York City. Its hubs of innovation aren't the great skyscraper districts that house established corporate and financial headquarters, media empires and wealthy people (an increasing number of whom are part-time residents who hail from the ranks of the global super-rich). The city's recent high-tech boom—500 start-ups in the last half decade, among them Kickstarter and Tumblr—is anchored in mid-rise, mixed-use neighborhoods like the Flatiron District, Midtown South, Chelsea and TriBeCa.
Google's New York office, second in size only to its headquarters in Silicon Valley, is in the old Port Authority terminal building across from the Chelsea Market, for which it paid $1.8 billion in 2010. These neighborhoods are filled with the sort of old buildings that, in Jacobs's famous phrase, new ideas "must use."
None of this is to say that New York should be preserved in amber. The move to increase density in Midtown East, for example, raising height restrictions to as high as 80 stories, will generate much-needed development in an area that's set up for it.
But balance is key. A great city needs a mix of neighborhoods and districts of varied heights and densities. And great care must be taken not to muck up those critical areas that spur true innovation and creativity. "Densities," Jacobs cautioned, "can get too high if they reach a point at which, for any reason, they begin to repress diversity instead of to stimulate it." It's a crucial lesson to absorb as our world grows ever more urban.
—Mr. Florida, director of the Martin Prosperity Institute at the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management and global research professor at New York University, is author of "The Rise of the Creative Class, Revisited," published this month by Basic Books.
A version of this article appeared July 28, 2012, on page C3 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: For Creative Cities, the Sky Has Its Limit.

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Night Games On The Roads

Video of accident (taken from a taxi) in which a Ferrari broadsides a Singapore taxi:





ABOVE: once a Ferrari.
LEFT: relative/friend of family of the Ferrari driver. Note the sartorial flair of our PRC 'cousins'.

Every major city in the world has an 'underbelly' of sorts. Singapore is no exception, despite it's hyped "clean and green", law-abiding image.


It's been boot-strapped into the 21st century and to maintain its economic progress the government has opened the tiny island to immigrants from all over the world, notably South Asia and the People's Republic of China.


Some say that native Singaporeans have not taken this well, blaming immigrants for loss of job opportunities, traffic jams, overcrowding in hospitals, almost unaffordable property prices and generally a lowering of standards in cleanliness, orderliness and respect for the country's laws.


While the government has let the prices of COEs climb to above SIN$90,000 for the Open category of private cars, with accompanying increases in COEs for other categories, public transportation has been shown to be insufficient to meet demands.


Some of you may not know that a COE or Certificate of Entitlement is merely the 'license' to buy a car and keep it on the roads for 10 years. 


In Singapore, cars themselves are among the priciest in the world as they attract hefty taxes.


According to edmunds.com (a leading auto web site in the USA)  the cost of a Lexus IS250 is approximately US$35,000 . That's about HK$272,000 or SIN$44,000.


However that model lists (at the Lexus agents in Singapore) at Sin$239,000! Add in a COE at Sin$91,000 and the car will cost you Sin$330,000 - before insurance and odds and ends.


That's around US$262,000 or HK$2.04 million!


When arrivistes buy Bentleys, Rolls Royces, Ferraris and Lamborghinis they are paying big bucks for those cars. The sight of these cars is just the thing to endear them to the working stiffs who are crammed like sardines in a bus or MRT train.


This leaves the government in a cleft stick; encourage foreign talent and capital or risk losing more votes at the next election?


Honestly, I like cars as much as any Singaporean, but I have an issue with drivers of the fast cars that shatter my slumber late at night (or, if you like, in the wee hours of the morning).


I live off Orchard/Scotts/Stevens roads and I hear these sports cars' night-shattering exhaust noises. Friends live on the other side of Orchard Road (Orchard Boulevard) and they hear these cars being driven hard too. 


But, complaints to the Traffic Police or the Land Transport Authority don't work. I hope that perhaps after this accident the authorities will take some much belated remedial action.


In the day time Singapore roads are generally too busy for speeding, but car enthusiasts come out to play when people are preparing to go to bed or have gone to sleep.


And if you believe what the Sports Car Club Singapore president said, then you also believe in fairy tales and the Tooth Fairy!


These enthusiasts should join those who drive their cars to a race track in Malaysia - where they can speed (in safety) to their heart's delight. And keep our roads safe - and quiet.













Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Pleasures of Air Travel

It’s 10:33am and I have been up for hours. The morning was bright except for some wisps of mist, but now the sunlight is being obscured by a thick mist and I cannot even see across the podium level gardens.

If it’s this misty, it must be Hong Kong in the throes of spring.

But I feel chipper all the same; it’s the sheer luxury of being alone, to do as I like for the rest of the day until I meet my friends for a celebration. Freedom!

Yes, I have things on my “to do” list, but they can wait a couple of days.

Nowadays I don’t enjoy traveling as much as I used to because of the planning and packing (in my case it is not accessorizing clothes but trying not to leave bits of computer and peripheral cables behind).

But once - like yesterday - I set out my hesitation at leaving the ‘old man’ at home evaporates. It helps to have a pleasant ride to the airport and I did, arriving in good time to check in. The SQ Economy check in at Row 3 was a little busy so we were asked to go to Row 6 (Business).

I met Miss New (her badge said ‘I am New’) who was flummoxed because she could not find my name on her computer. Only when she called a colleague over did I realize what it was about and suggested she flip a few pages; I’m not going to go through the hassle of getting a short term biometric passport (mine is good until 2014) for my abbreviated name.

As there was a screen that asked me to rate the service, I asked Miss New about it - and was duly informed that it was not yet in service or wasn’t working, I can’t remember which.

Same thing with the AED (defibrillator) stations in T3 which had signs that said they were not yet in service. So please don’t have a heart episode or attack when using T3. I only noticed it because the AED station was hard by the Information Counter where I had to go to get a slip of paper that facilitated using the ‘free’ wi-fi.

At least this time I only had to hand over my passport; before this I had to fill in a form. A real pain and I do not know what purpose it fills except to keep the bored Information Counter staff bobbing up and down.

A survey lady collared me “for less than a minute” to ask my opinion about the wi-fi registration and she kept her promise. Enough time for me to say it was a waste of time and no bar to terrorists or whatever. Maybe the government is just being a busybody and helping keep residents employed.

I took my time and got to Gate A12, to find it still closed. There were some personnel there but not the full complement and so early birds sat outside until the gate opened around 12:30p for our 1:30p flight.

Sometimes I fall sleep quickly on flights - usually after I am tired out running errands or cleaning house. But since I was reasonably organized, I was rather surprised to be overcome by sleep even before take-off.

Singapore may not be toxic for me, but it must be stressful because I only woke up to have my meal during which I imagined myself trying to eat in a straight jacket. My elbows were pinned to my sides; on my left by a well built man and on my right by the interior panel of the aircraft.

While I know I am expanding sideways, I am still not quite as portly as some and I wondered how they managed in today’s aircraft where there is a huge difference in seat dimensions, ranging from suites in ultra-first, through various configurations of business to ever tighter economy.

Since economy is the bread and butter of the airline business, you wonder when they will realize that there is a limit to how long they can treat passengers like battery chicken while they waste acreage on big spenders.

I liked it when Valuair, the precursor to Jetstar, came on the scene years ago - their one class seats were rather decent.

Anyway, we arrived on schedule at 5:15p although it seemed as if we were taxiing a long way - I asked the fight attendant if we were taxiing to Shenzen but she didn’t understand me at all! How is it that more often than not the male attendants speak better and are more efficient than some of the females who look as if they were cloned in the airline’s training school?

By 5:57p, I was ensconced in the Airport Express to Hong Kong having waited for luggage and then bought my 30-day return ticket.

That beats T3 perhaps because I usually land at the farthest gate, miss the train and then have to wait ages for luggage (I have this notion that economy class luggage is delayed so that Singaporeans can appreciate traveling First, Business or be a high value frequent traveller).

Also at T3, if you are descending to the car park, you have to contend with the world’s slowest lifts which are programmed to be on another floor! With the vast amount of space Singapore affords the air terminals, why didn’t the architects incorporate escalators that accommodate luggage trolleys?

It’s not as if it’s the first airport or terminal we have ever built.

By 6:22p we arrived in Hong Kong and just before 7p I was at home (luckily most of the traffic was in Central or heading down Stubbs Road)! How I wish Singapore had such seamless and quick public transport.

Saturday, August 27, 2011

Couldn't believe my ears

Well, I decided to looks for some statistics that would back up what I thought I heard on TV last night. But what I found was different from what I heard!


Here goes:




The population 'bulge' is moving upwards but over 70s are not as big a bloc as I thought I heard the CNA presenters say. My fault!

Our Sun Times finally arrived and so we could have our Sunday 'read'.  

Back to Boring


Woke up to more of the same. 

On the surface nothing has changed in post-Presidential Elections Singapore of August 28, 2011.

Toadie Tan won by a margin slimmer than a skimping restaurant’s slice of jamon iberico.

But hope springs eternal and I hope that the ruling party and government do not continue to deny the presence of the elephant in the room.

It has grown from little Dumbo to a huge Jumbo.

The people of Singapore want more value for their money and less elitism; the Pyramid Club is not the only society with brains and ability. In part, thanks for this must go to our new citizens.

I suspect that my fellow Singaporeans are not going to be satisfied with the status quo.

Toadie was expected to win comfortably but the margin suggests that even new Singaporeans think before they cast their votes.

The majority of old, the very rich, the inner circle, the kiasu continue to vote for the ‘safe’ choice. 

Paradoxically, the "uncles and aunties"  form a significant bloc (CNA said last night that The 70+ or 75+ years of age account for something like 25 or more percent of Singaporeans). 

I say that because this is the group that has a less than  comfortable old age - having trouble making ends meet  -evIdenced by many of them working clearing tables in food centres.


A win by Dr Tan Cheng Bock (“Doc”) would have meant a new spring in our collective step. 

Hobbled though the Presidency might be, he would have brought fresh air into our our tightly controlled bubble.

This election also showed that the obedient mainstream media was not a match for the updates from the likes of Facebook (I don’t tweet). 

The paucity of news at 7:00am this morning and the feed was from the wire services shows what a lack of competition can do.

No doubt editors were hotly debating headlines and photographs but in the meantime early risers had themselves for company at coffee shops on our tiny speck of an island.